Thursday, May 28, 2009

Why Music Matters

This is c+p'd from Amanda Palmer's blog

Why Music Matters
Karl Paulnack, Director, Music Division

The Boston Conservatory

Dr. Karl Paulnack’s Welcome Address to parents of incoming students, September 2004

“One of my parents’ deepest fears, I suspect, is that society would not properly value me as a musician… I had very good grades in high school, I was good in science and math, and they imagined that as a doctor or a research chemist or an engineer, I might be more appreciated… I still remember my mother’s remark when I announced my decision to apply to music school. She said, “You’re wasting your SAT scores!” On some level, I think, my parents were not sure themselves what the value of music was, what its purpose was. And they loved music: they listened to classical music all the time. They just weren’t really clear about its function. So let me talk about that a little bit, because we live in a society that puts music in the “arts and entertainment” section of the newspaper, and serious music, the kind your kids are about to engage in, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with entertainment, in fact it’s the opposite… Let me talk a little bit about music, and how it works.

One of the first cultures to articulate how music really works were the ancient Greeks. And this is going to fascinate you: the Greeks said that music and astronomy were two sides of the same coin. Astronomy was seen as the study of relationships between observable, permanent, external objects, and music was seen as the study of relationships between invisible, internal, hidden objects. Music has a way of finding the big, invisible moving pieces inside our hearts and souls and helping us figure out the position of things inside us. Let me give you some examples of how this works.

One of the most profound musical compositions of all time is the Quartet for the End of Time written by French composer Olivier Messiaen in 1940. Messiaen was 31 years old when France entered the war against Nazi Germany. He was captured by the Germans in June of 1940 and imprisoned in a prisoner-of-war camp.

He was fortunate to find a sympathetic prison guard who gave him paper and a place to compose, and fortunate to have musician colleagues in the camp, a cellist, a violinist, and a clarinetist. Messiaen wrote his quartet with these specific players in mind. It was performed in January 1941 for four thousand prisoners and guards in the prison camp. Today it is one of the most famous masterworks in the repertoire.

Given what we have since learned about life in the Nazi camps, why would anyone in his right mind waste time and energy writing or playing music? There was barely enough energy on a good day to find food and water, to avoid a beating, to stay warm, to escape torture — why would anyone bother with music? And yet even from the concentration camps we have poetry, we have music, we have visual art; it wasn’t just this one fanatic Messiaen; many, many people created art. Why? Well, in a place where people are only focused on survival, on the bare necessities, the obvious conclusion is that art must be, somehow, essential for life. The camps were without money, without hope, without commerce, without recreation, without basic respect, but they were not without art. Art is part of survival; art is part of the human spirit, an unquenchable expression of who we are. Art is one of the ways in which we say, “I am alive, and my life has meaning.”

The responsibility I will charge your sons and daughters with is this: “If we were a medical school, and you were here as a med student practicing appendectomies, you’d take your work very seriously because you would imagine that some night at 2 AM someone is going to waltz into your emergency room and you’re going to have to save their life. Well, my friends, someday at 8 PM someone is going to walk into your concert hall and bring you a mind that is confused, a heart that is overwhelmed, a soul that is weary. Whether they go out whole again will depend partly on how well you do your craft.

“Frankly, ladies and gentlemen, I expect you not only to master music, I expect you to save the planet. If there is a future wave of wellness on this planet, of harmony, of peace, of an end to war, of mutual understanding, of equality, of fairness, I don’t expect it will come from a government, a military force or a corporation. I no longer even expect it to come from the religions of the world, which together seem to have brought us as much war as they have peace. If there is a future of peace for humankind, if there is to be an understanding of how these invisible, internal things should fit together, I expect it will come from the artists, because that’s what we do. As in the concentration camp and the evening of 9/11, the artists are the ones who might be able to help us with our internal, invisible lives.”

----

By the way, I saw Star Trek the other day and it was awesome!

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Post Secret

I love these quirky postcards from PostSecret







Tuesday, May 12, 2009

"Stimulating" the economy

A few days ago, I learnt that I'm not the only person in the world who thinks the word "stimulate" is an inappropriate word to describe repairing the current financial crisis.

Whenever I hear the word stimulation, I really can't help but giggle. Of course, I had always pinned it down to my emotional immaturity, but last week, I discovered that other people were of the same frame of mind.

Take this almost-fake scenario involving someone who may or may not have been me:

Person: Good old Rudd, stimulating the economy by giving out free cash. Finally, I can pay off my ferrari.
Other person: Ha, stimulate the economy... more like STIMULATE MY PANTS.
(silence ensues)

A certain friend of mine who sleeptalks in Spanish was telling me that whenever one of her co-workers gets their Rudd money, they walk into work yelling "I just got stimulated!" It's amusing, these little things, but it really makes you wonder: was there really no other word more suitable to describe solving the economy other than "stimulate?" I'm pretty sure I can think of a hundred topics of which the word "stimulate" would be much more appropriate and none of them involve the economy. At all. (wink wink, nudge nudge)

I guess there's always the idea that "stimulate" euphemizes this global shindig, by making it seem less harsh. That I can understand - stimulating the economy doesn’t sound quite as bad as “trying to escape from the collective grave we dug ourselves.”

Anyway, I'm going to stop writing and start baking, but I'll probably add a thousand edit points later on.

Stimulating read, no?

PS. For non Australian readers (unlikely! but anyway..) our Prime Minister Kevin "K-Rudd" Rudd is handing out cash as a short-term solution for our finance problems. It's a nice gesture, putting our country into further debt, but if I think I know Australians (and I'm pretty sure, I do!) I know that 90% of people went to the pub or put deposits on cars.